Unexpected Survey Problems

Surveyor-Homes

Unexpected Survey Problems a Possibility without a Survey

I recently wrote about the common objections homebuyers have to ordering a property survey prior to closing on property. In this article, I wanted to provide a few examples of survey problems I have encountered over the years. The goal here is not to terrorize anyone into spending money on a survey that is not needed. It is rather to increase awareness and vigilance in the property buying process.

1. New home construction in old neighborhood, post closing discovery that house was built partially on adjacent lot.

In this case, a builder acquired a lot in an old subdivision. The end consumer who purchased the new home did not have a survey performed, but instead relied on a project drawing provided by the builder. What we learned in researching the encroachment and defect was that many of the houses on this particular street were not build in the dead center of their respective lot. In fact, the houses were built lopsided on one side of their lot boundaries. It appears that the builder constructed on what was perceived to be, but not actually, the center of the vacant lot. The end result was the final structure more or less straddled down the middle of two lots, with one-half of the home on the correct lot and the other half on the adjacent owner's lot. This is an example where there was no dispute as to the legal ownership of the land purchased by the new owner; instead, the property acquired only contained one-half of the home. This case highlights several important points—
  • Encroachments may exist for periods of time unnoticed;
  • Title insurance policies may limit or exclude coverage (without a survey) for improvements;
  • Avoid the temptation to being "led by the eye" (what is seen may not represent legal realities).

2. Old homeowner has in-ground swimming pool installed, new buyer has survey performed prior that shows pool on community property.

Encroachments involving swimming pools and pool houses are fairly common. Occasionally, a homeowner will inadvertently install the pool pump over the lot line on the neighbor's property. It seems that more effort goes into deciding on placement of the actual pool and the placement of the pool equipment becomes secondary. However, in this case, at least half of the swimming pool was located across the lot line. We learned that the homeowner actually obtained permission from the homeowner association to acquire the strip of land where the pool would be installed. We even obtained documentation from the county that zoning and permitting was conditioned on receiving fee simple title to the tract. Truth be told, the homeowner apparently did not follow through with getting actual title to the property. Although we were able to get dozens of signatures from other homeowners needed to make a quorum in order to legally pass title from the homeowner association, this would have been difficult for any subsequent homeowner to obtain. This case highlights several important points, as well—
  • Never rely on verbal representations concerning property lines or improvements from existing homeowners. Unfortunately, out of dishonesty, desperation or ignorance, homeowners are not always forthright or correct in representations about their own property;
  • Whenever purchasing property with improvements outside the main dwelling structure, always have a new survey performed since title policies may exclude or limit coverage for these items.

3. Two rural properties are advertised for sale, buyer discovers post closing that the wrong tract purchased.

This example involved bank owned property ("REO") of rural land. In rural areas separate land parcels may be identified under a common street number. In this case, the buyer contracted for and closed on a particular tract of land. Unfortunately, the buyer actually intended to purchase the adjacent tract which, unbeknownst to the buyer, had the same street address. Neither the contract nor the deed was legally defective. Had a survey been performed during the due diligence period, the buyer could have confirmed the property that was being purchased.

While surveys showing title defects or encumbrances are not all that common, it is still extremely important to evaluate the risks before proceeding without a survey. Most real estate lawyers I know would insist on new survey before closing. I know I would.

CHRIS PAHL
Real Estate Attorney
3575 Piedmont Road NE
Building 15, Suite 120
Atlanta, GA 30305

Tel. +1 (404) 476-3736
email:
chris@GeorgiaTitle.com
web:
GeorgiaTitle.com | GetMyGFE.com

Comments

Survey Says...You Might Need a Land Survey

Article discuses arguments for and against expending money for a land survey prior to closing. Read More...
Comments

Preventing Email and Wire Fraud

Article discusses recent fraud activity targeting real estate agents and their client homebuyers. Read More...
Comments

Short Sale Sellers Lose Tax Relief in 2015

Tax Relief for Short Sale Sellers expires on December 31, 2014 unless renewed by Congress. Read More...
Comments
©2014, 2015 & 2016 CHRIS PAHL Attorney at Law | Paper & Dirt Real Estate Blog | Contact Me